Round Rock Engine 7
2008 Spartan/Crimson, Delivered 1-26-09 More Photos / Discussion Here Photo By Seth Granville at x635Photos.com
You are currently browsing entries filed in: Apparatus News Central
Brady Engine
Brady Fire Department traded in their 2004 Freightliner/Rosenbauer 2 door commercial cab low side compartment engine for a 1996 Spartan/3D rescue engine. The new to them engine has more cab space and more compartment space so equipment from 3 different apparatus has been consolidated to this first out truck. They are still in the process [...]
Haltom City Engine 473
Haltom City has a new Rosenbauer engine based on a Spartan Gladiator chassis/Central body, running as E-473, similar to the last new engine, with 200 CFM, CAFS, Waterous 1500GPM pump, 500 gal tank, Cummins engine, Allison transmission, Smartpower, 10KW, Wheelen LED lights. Courtesy of Ben Saladino at Bensware.com
Azle Engine 52
Azle has received a new Rosenbauer custom engine (Engine 52) on a Spartan Gladiator/Central chassis. It has a Caterpillar C-9 engine, Allison transmission, Hale 1500 gpm pump with a FoamPro system. It also has a 100’ hydraulic rescue tool and electric reels, SVI Knight Sight system, front brow light, hydraulic ladder rack, Onan plumbed diesel [...]
Dallas Ladder 37
2007 Spartan/Crimson 100′ Photo By Seth Granville at x635Photos.com
Williamson County Mobile Command Post
Williamson County Emergency Management Mobile Command Post (old Capital Metro bus) Photo By Seth Granville at x635Photos.com
Temple Rescue 3
2007 Spartan Gladiator Evolution/Crimson. Region 7 Hazmat Response Team. Quartered with Engine 3 @ Station 3. Photo By Seth Granville at x635Photos.com
- Jim Runge: Robert, I was at the Greenwood NHS ceremony tonight. I am 68 so am probably much older than you, but still thought our paths might have crossed somewhere along the way. I grew up in Eldorado, was in scouts, athletics, etc. Went to A & M and NTSU, lived in McKInney, Austin, and a few other Texas cities. If you are not the one I knew, maybe I knew one of your relatives?
- Mookie: To say that the TLGC was instituted by communists is one of the most contrived statements and shows little, if any, understanding of what the code states and what it's purpose is. Mr. Henson has crack in his grits. There is no more individual statute standing in front of public information for those whose citizens have granted Civil Service than for those who have not. Only the step by step process has to be followed, and for those who write for a living or who are CPA's, step by step processes should pose no difficulty. Often times, overzealous journalists seeking to break a story (even at the expense of the truth) need to be reminded that facts rule decisions; not the expediency by which you can get your eyeballs on an adult's personnel file. Mayor David Cook can absolutely be whatever percentage granted him by you, as a commenter, correct. But that doesn't mean that Civil Service is being sought by the firefighters to try and hide their behavior in any way. More often than not, the attorney fees come in when the City Management or elected Council decide that there is no reason to follow due process and that 'they know what's best'. That, even to a communist, is the definition of the good ole' boy system. A 50,000 person city needs rules, structure, and processes by which cooler heads prevail. Mr. Barg, it shouldn't be too awfully hard to follow the rules, and you know as well as the rest of us that 99% of your Mansfield firefighters follow those rules. Who are they to turn to when those rules are thrown asunder by their boss or bosses? Will you be there to make sure that every time these men and women need guidance in fair practices that they will get their fair shake? Mr. Barg, how many Mansfield firefighters have you sat and spoken to about this issue? Have you spoken to the Mansfield Firefighters Association? Have you talked to their wives and children? Communist's love their children, too, Mr. Barg. And they have to provide for them. It is not easier to provide with Civil Service, it is simply more fair. It absolutely levels the playing field, and I can empathize with why that would scare folks who want to control. But, c'mon; communism and grits is the best the opposition has? (For the record; I live in Central Texas; have never been to Mansfield, don't like grits, and was born in Ft. Worth. Lastly, comments on a website run by firefighters for firefighters should be about the last place to post anit-civil service rhetoric.....)
- Andrew Barg: In the 1940s and 1950s, progressives ( the progressive party was started as a disguised communist party in the early 1900's) implemented civil service reforms under Chapter 143 as a mechanism to protect public servants against machine politics, says About 70 cities voted to adopt Chapter 143. In the early 1970s, the legislature passed the state's open records law, which opened up internal affairs records of police departments to public scrutiny. But in 1989, police associations succeeded in convincing the state legislature to pass an exemption to the open records law for Chapter 143 cities. That meant internal affairs investigations in cities like Dallas who never adopted Chapter 143 remained readily accessible to the public. Meanwhile, cities like Garland, Houston, Fort Worth and others were able to hide many of their internal affairs records from public view. "It just makes it virtually impossible to evaluate police misconduct in any but the most extreme cases," said Henson, who now writes Grits for Breakfast, a blog that focuses on Texas criminal issues. "It makes departments less accountable. The public is less informed. It allows bad cops to act with impunity, knowing they will never be exposed in most cases." In this case, months later, I did subsequently obtain the Morrow internal investigation through other means. Source - dallas morning news 2010 article http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/03/about-eight-months-ago-i.html It seems to me that Mayor David Cook is 100% correct in opposing this measure being implemented in Mansfield. The firefighter union supports it because it allows them to be exempted from open records laws and, thus, remain unaccountable to the public. They also support it, as the president of the firefighters association stated, to have rights to an appeal process to hiring and presumed firing of public SERVANTS. This makes it very difficult to fire anybody. Lawyers will have to spend considerable time defending the city every time they try to fire a worker. It can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fire a single worker. Call me a good ol boy, but I think the mayor, the city council, and any other ELECTED mansfield politician should be able to fire civil servants at will, for any reason whatsoever. Let us vote and decide if they abuse that privelege. Not some group of "volunteers" stacked by the firefighters union making decisions that are exempted from open records laws. Vote NO on proposition 1
- mary sanders: Was there ever a determination of what caused this fire? This was my nephew's ex-wife, Christian Hoffman
- B Elsom: Previous post should say "entrance" not "interest".
Advertisements
